Description of Design Process .


     Morris Asimow was among the first to give a detailed description of the complete design process in what he called the morphology of design. His seven phases of design are described below, with slight changes of terminology to conform to current practice. Figure 1 shows the various activities that make up the first three phases of design: conceptual design, embodiment design, and detail design. This eight-step set of design activities is our representation of the basic design process. The purpose of this graphic is to remind you of the logical sequence of activities that leads from problem definition to the detail design.


1 Phase I. Conceptual Design


    Conceptual design is the process by which the design is initiated, carried to the point of creating a number of possible solutions, and narrowed down to a single best concept. It is sometimes called the feasibility study. Conceptual design is the phase that requires the greatest creativity, involves the most uncertainty, and requires coordination among many functions in the business organization. The following are the discrete activities that we consider under conceptual design.


Identification of customer needs: The goal of this activity is to completely understand the customers’ needs and to communicate them to the design team. Problem definition: The goal of this activity is to create a statement that describes what has to be accomplished to satisfy the needs of the customer. This involves analysis of competitive products, the establishment of target specifications, and the listing of constraints and trade-offs. Quality function deployment (QFD) is a valuable tool for linking customer needs with design requirements. A detailed listing of the product requirements is called a product design specification (PDS).

Gathering information: Engineering design presents special requirements over engineering research in the need to acquire a broad spectrum of information.

Conceptualization: Concept generation involves creating a broad set of concepts that potentially satisfy the problem statement. Team-based creativity methods, combined with efficient information gathering, are the key activities.

Concept selection: Evaluation of the design concepts, modifying and evolving into a single preferred concept, are the activities in this step. The process usually re- quires several iterations.

Refinement of the PDS: The product design specification is revisited after the concept has been selected. The design team must commit to achieving certain critical values of design parameters, usually called critical to quality (CTQ) parameters, and to living with trade-offs between cost and performance.

Design review: Before committing funds to move to the next design phase, a design review will be held. The design review will assure that the design is physically realizable and that it is economically worthwhile. It will also look at a detailed product- development schedule. This is needed to devise a strategy to minimize product cycle time and to identify the resources in people, equipment, and money needed to complete the project.

2 Phase II. Embodiment Design

    Structured development of the design concept occurs in this engineering design phase. It is the place where flesh is placed on the skeleton of the design concept. An embodiment of all the main functions that must be performed by the product must be undertaken. It is in this design phase that decisions are made on strength, material selection, size, shape, and spatial compatibility. Beyond this design phase, major changes become very expensive. This design phase is sometimes called preliminary design. Embodiment design is concerned with three major tasks product architecture, configuration design, and parametric design.

Product architecture: Product architecture is concerned with dividing the overall design system into subsystems or modules. In this step we decide how the physical components of the design are to be arranged and combined to carry out the functional duties of the design.

Configuration design of parts and components:  Parts are made up of features like holes, ribs, splines, and curves. Configuring a part means to determine what features will be present and how those features are to be arranged in space relative to each other. While modeling and simulation may be performed in this stage to check out function and spatial constraints, only approximate sizes are determined to assure that the part satisfies the PDS. Also, more specificity about materials and manufacturing is given here. The generation of a physical model of the part with rapid prototyping processes may be appropriate.

Parametric design of parts : Parametric design starts with information on the configuration of the part and aims to establish its exact dimensions and tolerances. Final decisions on the material and manufacturing processes are also established if this has not been done previously. An important aspect of parametric design is to examine the part, assembly, and system for design robustness. Robustness refers to how consistently a component performs under variable conditions in its service environment.


3 Phase III. Detail Design

     In this phase the design is brought to the stage of a complete engineering description of a tested and producible product. Missing information is added on the arrangement, form, dimensions, tolerances, surface properties, materials, and manufacturing processes of each part. This results in a specification for each special-purpose part and for each standard part to be purchased from suppliers. In the detail design phase the following activities are completed and documents are prepared:

● Detailed engineering drawings suitable for manufacturing. Routinely these are computer-generated drawings, and they often include three-dimensional CAD models.

● Verification testing of prototypes is successfully completed and verification data is submitted. All critical-to quality parameters are confirmed to be under control. Usually the building and testing of several preproduction versions of the product will be accomplished.

● Assembly drawings and assembly instructions also will be completed. The bill of materials for all assemblies will be completed.

● A detailed product specification, updated with all the changes made since the conceptual design phase, will be prepared.

● Decisions on whether to make each part internally or to buy from an external supplier will be made. 

● With the preceding information, a detailed cost estimate for the product will be carried out.

● Finally, detail design concludes with a design review before the decision is made to pass the design information on to manufacturing.

    Phases I, II, and III take the design from the realm of possibility to the real world of practicality. However, the design process is not finished with the delivery of a set of detailed engineering drawings and specifications to the manufacturing organization. Many other technical and business decisions must be made that are really part of the design process. A great deal of thought and planning must go into how the design will be manufactured, how it will be marketed, how it will be maintained during use, and finally, how it will be retired from service and replaced by a new, improved design. Generally these phases of design are carried out elsewhere in the organization than in the engineering department or product development department. As the project proceeds into the new phases, the expenditure of money and personnel time increases greatly.

    One of the basic decisions that must be made at this point is which parts will be made by the product developing company and which will be made by an outside vendor or supplier. This often is called the “make or buy” decision. Today, one additional question must be asked: “Will the parts be made and/or assembled in the United States or in another country where labor rates are much lower?”

4 Phase IV. Planning for Manufacture

    A great deal of detailed planning must be done to provide for the production of the design. A method of manufacture must be established for each component in the system. As a usual first step, a process sheet is created; it contains a sequential list of all manufacturing operations that must be performed on the component. Also, it specifies the form and condition of the material and the tooling and production machines that will be used. The information on the process sheet makes possible the estimation of the production cost of the component. High costs may indicate the need for a change in material or a basic change in the design. Close interaction with manufacturing, industrial, materials, and mechanical engineers is important at this step.

The other important tasks performed in phase IV are the following:

● Designing specialized tools and fixtures

● Specifying the production plant that will be used (or designing a new plant) and laying out the production lines

● Planning the work schedules and inventory controls (production control)

● Planning the quality assurance system

● Establishing the standard time and labor costs for each operation

● Establishing the system of information flow necessary to control the manufacturing operation

All of these tasks are generally considered to fall within industrial or manufacturing engineering.

5 Phase V. Planning for Distribution

    Important technical and business decisions must be made to provide for the effective distribution to the consumer of the products that have been produced. In the strict realm of design, the shipping package may be critical. Concepts such as the shelf life of the product may also be critical and may need to be addressed in the earlier stages of the design process. A system of warehouses for distributing the product may have to be designed if none exists. The economic success of the design often depends on the skill exercised in marketing the product. If it is a consumer product, the sales effort is concentrated on advertising in print and video media, but highly technical products may require that the marketing step be a technical activity supported by specialized sales brochures, performance test data, and technically trained sales engineers. 6

6 Phase VI. Planning for Use

    The use of the product by the consumer is all-important, and considerations of how the consumer will react to the product pervade all steps of the design process. The following specific topics can be identified as being important user-oriented concerns in the design process: ease of maintenance, durability, reliability, product safety, convenience in use (human factors engineering), aesthetic appeal, and economy of operation. Obviously, these consumer-oriented issues must be considered in the design process at its very beginning. They are not issues to be treated as afterthoughts.

    Phase VI of design is less well defined than the others, but it is becoming increasingly important with the growing concerns for consumer protection and product safety. More strict interpretation of product liability laws is having a major impact on design. An important phase VI activity is the acquisition of reliable data on failures, service lives, and consumer complaints and attitudes to provide a basis for product improvement in the next design cycle.

7 Phase VII. Planning for Retirement of the Product

     The final step in the design process is the disposal of the product when it has reached the end of its useful life. Useful life may be determined by actual deterioration and wear to the point at which the design can no longer function, or it may be determined by technological obsolescence, in which a competing design performs the product’s functions either better or cheaper. In consumer products, it may come about through changes in fashion or taste.

    In the past, little attention has been given in the design process to product retirement. This is rapidly changing, as people the world over are becoming concerned about environmental issues. There is concern with depletion of mineral and energy resources, and with pollution of the air, water, and land as a result of manufacturing and technology advancement. This has led to a formal area of study called industrial ecology. Design for the environment, also called green design, has become an important consideration in design. As a result, the design of a product should include a plan for either its disposal in an environmentally safe way or, better, the recycling of its materials or the re-manufacture or reuse of its components.


What is Engineering Design Process ( Mechanical Design Engineer ) ?

The engineering design process can be used to achieve several different outcomes. One is the design of products, whether they be consumer goods such as refrigerators, power tools, or DVD players, or highly complex products such as a missile system or a jet transport plane. Another is a complex engineered system such as an electrical power generating station or a petrochemical plant, while yet another is the design of a building or a bridge. However, the emphasis in this text is on product design because it is an area in which many engineers will apply their design skills. Moreover, examples taken from this area of design are easier to grasp without extensive specialized knowledge. This chapter presents the engineering design process from three perspectives. Inthe design method is contrasted with the scientific method, and design is presented as a five-step problem-solving methodology. the role of design beyond that of meeting technical performance requirements and introduces the idea that design must meet the needs of society at large. lays out a cradle-to-the-grave road map of the design process, showing that the responsibility of the engineering designer extends from the creation of a design until its embodiment is disposed of in an environmentally safe way. Chapter 2 extends the engineering design process to the broader issue of product development by introducing more business oriented issues such as product positioning and marketing.

1. Importance of the Engineering Design Process

In the 1980's when companies in the United States first began to seriously feel the impact of quality products from overseas, it was natural for them to place an empha- sis on reducing their manufacturing costs through automation and moving plants to lower-labor-cost regions. However, it was not until the publication of a major study of the National Research Council (NRC)3 that companies came to realize that the real key to world-competitive products lies in high-quality product design. This has stimu- lated a rash of experimentation and sharing of results about better ways to do product design. What was once a fairly cut-and-dried engineering process has become one of the cutting edges of engineering progress. This text aims at providing you with insight into the current best practices for doing engineering design. The importance of design is nicely summed up in Fig. This shows that only a small fraction of the cost to produce a product ( 5 percent) is involved with the design process, while the other 95 percent of cost is consumed by the materials, capital, and labor to manufacture the product. However, the design process consists of the accumulation of many decisions that result in design commitments that affect about 70 to 80 percent of the manufactured cost of the product. In other words, the decisions made beyond the design phase can influence only about 25 percent of the total cost. If the design proves to be faulty just before the product goes to market, it will cost a great deal of money to correct the problem. To summarize: Decisions made in the design process cost very little in terms of the overall product cost but have a major effect on the cost of the product. The second major impact of design is on product quality. The old concept of prod- uct quality was that it was achieved by inspecting the product as it came off the production line. Today we realize that true quality is designed into the product. Achieving quality through product design will be a theme that pervades this book. For now we point out that one aspect of quality is to incorporate within the product the performance and features that are truly desired by the customer who purchases the product. In addition, the design must be carried out so that the product can be made without defect at a competitive cost. To summarize: You cannot compensate in manufacturing for defects introduced in the design phase. The third area where engineering design determines product competitiveness is product cycle time. Cycle time refers to the development time required to bring a new product to market. In many consumer areas the product with the latest “bells and whistles” captures the customers’ fancy. The use of new organizational methods, the widespread use of computer-aided engineering, and rapid prototyping methods are contributing to reducing product cycle time. Not only does reduced cycle time increase the marketability of a product, but it reduces the cost of product development. Furthermore, the longer a product is available for sale the more sales and profits there will be. To summarize: The design process should be conducted so as to develop quality, cost-competitive products in the shortest time possible.


crease the marketability of a product, but it reduces the cost of product development. Furthermore, the longer a product is available for sale the more sales and profits there will be. To summarize: The design process should be conducted so as to develop quality, cost-competitive products in the shortest time possible.


2. Types of Designs 

Engineering design can be undertaken for many different reasons, and it may take different forms. 

● Original design, also called innovative design . This form of design is at the top of the hierarchy. It employs an original, innovative concept to achieve a need. Some- times, but rarely, the need itself may be original. A truly original design involves invention. Successful original designs occur rarely, but when they do occur they usually disrupt existing markets because they have in them the seeds of new technology of far-reaching consequences. The design of the microprocessor was one such original design. 

● Adaptive design . This form of design occurs when the design team adapts a known solution to satisfy a different need to produce a novel application. For example, adapting the ink-jet printing concept to spray binder to hold particles in place in a rapid prototyping machine. Adaptive designs involve synthesis and are relatively common in design. 

● Redesign . Much more frequently, engineering design is employed to improve an existing design. The task may be to redesign a component in a product that is fail- ing in service, or to redesign a component so as to reduce its cost of manufacture. Often redesign is accomplished without any change in the working principle or concept of the original design. For example, the shape may be changed to reduce a 1 1 6 engineering design stress concentration, or a new material substituted to reduce weight or cost. When redesign is achieved by changing some of the design parameters, it is often called variant design. 

● Selection design. Most designs employ standard components such as bearings, small motors, or pumps that are supplied by vendors specializing in their manufacture and sale. Therefore, in this case the design task consists of selecting the components with the needed performance, quality, and cost from the catalogs of potential vendors.

● Industrial design. This form of design deals with improving the appeal of a product to the human senses, especially its visual appeal. While this type of design is more artistic than engineering, it is a vital aspect of many kinds of design. Also encompassed by industrial design is a consideration of how the human user can best inter- face with the product.


Introduction of Engineering Design ( Mechanical Design Engineer ).

What is design? If you search the literature for an answer to that question, you will find about as many definitions as there are designs. Perhaps the reason is that the process of design is such a common human experience. Webster’s dictionary says that to design is “to fashion after a plan,” but that leaves out the essential fact that to design is to create something that has never been. Certainly an engineering designer practices design by that definition, but so does an artist, a sculptor, a composer, a playwright, or many another creative member of our society. 

Thus, although engineers are not the only people who design things, it is true that  the professional practice of engineering is largely concerned with design; it is often said that design is the essence of engineering. To design is to pull together something new or to arrange existing things in a new way to satisfy a recognized need of society. An elegant word for “pulling together” is  synthesis . We shall adopt the following formal definition of design: “Design establishes and defines solutions to and pertinent structures for problems not solved before, or new solutions to problems which have previously been solved in a different way.” 1 The ability to design is both a science and an art. The science can be learned through techniques and methods to be covered in this text, but the art is best learned by doing design. It is for this reason that your design experience must involve some realistic project experience. The emphasis that we have given to the creation of new things in our introduction to design should not unduly alarm you. To become proficient in design is a perfectly attainable goal for an engineering student, but its attainment requires the guided experience that we intend this text to provide. Design should not be confused with discovery. Discovery is getting the first sight of, or the first knowledge of something, as when Columbus discovered America or Jack Kilby made the first microprocessor. We can discover what has already existed but has not been known before, but a design is the product of planning and work.

We should note that a design may or may not involve invention . To obtain a legal patent on an invention requires that the design be a step beyond the limits of the existing knowledge (beyond the state of the art). Some designs are truly inventive, but most are not. Look up the word  design in a dictionary and you will find that it can be either a noun or a verb. One noun definition is “the form, parts, or details of something according to a plan,” as in the use of the word  design in “My new design is ready for review.” A common definition of the word  design as a verb is “to conceive or to form a plan for,” as in “I have to design three new models of the product for three different overseas markets.” Note that the verb form of  design is also written as “designing.” Often the phrase “design process” is used to emphasize the use of the verb form of  design. It is important to understand these differences and to use the word appropriately.
Good design requires both analysis and synthesis. Typically we approach complex problems like design by  decomposing the problem into manageable parts. Because we need to understand how the part will perform in service, we must be able to calculate as much about the part’s expected behavior as possible before it exists in physical form by using the appropriate disciplines of science and engineering science and the necessary computational tools. This is called  analysis . It usually involves the simplification of the real world through models.  Synthesis involves the identification of the design elements that will comprise the product, its decomposition into parts, and the combination of the part solutions into a total workable system.

At your current stage in your engineering education you are much more familiar and comfortable with analysis. You have dealt with courses that were essentially disciplinary. For example, you were not expected to use thermodynamics and fluid mechanics in a course in mechanics of materials. The problems you worked in the course were selected to illustrate and reinforce the principles. If you could construct the appropriate model, you usually could solve the problem. Most of the input data and properties were given, and there usually was a correct answer to the problem. However, real-world problems rarely are that neat and circumscribed. The real problem that your design is expected to solve may not be readily apparent. You may need to draw on many technical disciplines (solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, electro magnetic theory, etc.) for the solution and usually on nonengineering disciplines as well (economics, finance, law, etc.). The input data may be fragmentary at best, and the scope of the project may be so huge that no individual can follow it all. If that is not difficult enough, usually the design must proceed under severe constraints of time and/or money. There may be major societal constraints imposed by environmental or energy regulations. Finally, in the typical design you rarely have a way of knowing the correct answer. Hopefully, your design works, but is it the best, most efficient design that could have been achieved under the conditions? Only time will tell. 

We hope that this has given you some idea of the design process and the environment in which it occurs. One way to summarize the challenges presented by the design environment is to think of the four C’s of design.  One thing that should be clear 

The Four C’s of Design 

1 Creativity 
●   Requires creation of something that has not existed before or has not existed in the designer’s mind before 

2 Complexity 
●   Requires decisions on many variables and parameters 

3 Choice 
●   Requires making choices between many possible solutions at all levels, from basic concepts to the smallest detail of shape 

4 Compromise 
●   Requires balancing multiple and sometimes conflicting requirements 


by now is how engineering design extends well beyond the boundaries of science. The expanded boundaries and responsibilities of engineering create almost unlimited opportunities for you. In your professional career you may have the opportunity to create dozens of designs and have the satisfaction of seeing them become working realities. “A scientist will be lucky if he makes one creative addition to human knowledge in his whole life, and many never do. A scientist can discover a new star but he cannot make one. He would have to ask an engineer to do it for him.”